When Congressman Joe Wilson cried out "You Lie", during President Obama's health-care address to Congress in 2009, he violated the Congressional rules of decorum, but did raise a question that gets more pertinent as Obama ramps up his electoral rhetoric. Is it OK to say things as fact that are really opinions? What about stretching data to fit your narrative? What if you know it is false, but others will believe you? What if everybody knows it is false, but it would be really, really nice if it were true?
Actually, in the past couple of months President Obama has made at least three statements which were so divorced from obvious reality that one has to wonder what he thinks and what he thinks the public thinks.
1. In early April, Obama - flanked by the uncomfortable Felipe Calderon of Mexico and Stephen Harper of Canada - railed preemptively against the potential "activist" Supreme Court which might strike down Obamacare,"a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected Congress." In 2009, Obamacare passed the House 219 to 212 with all Republicans and 34 Democrats voting "no"; it passed the Senate 60 to 39, with no Republican votes. The stench of the deals needed to obtain its passage contributed greatly to the rise of the Tea Party and the Democrats major electoral losses in 2010. Today the public wants it repealed by 50% to 40%. Maybe his base likes it; maybe it is a legacy that will grow in popularity over the years; maybe it was a tribute to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid's legislative skills; but a mandate in Congress? It would be interesting to know if he believes that.
2. In May Obama called Mitt Romney's criticism of Obama's spending and debt as a "cowpie of distortion", requiring the hapless Jay Carney to claim that under Obama spending has increased at the slowest rate since Eisenhower. Well, if you take the level of Bush spending (No Child Left Behind; Medicare Part B; Iraq; Afghanistan) as a base, add the TARP and the Stimulus to create a "Revised Bush Base", and accept the limitations later placed by a Republican Congress, a cross-eyed statistician might be able to ignore the fact that Obama has run up $5.5 trillion of debt and consistently had federal spending over 24% of GDP for the first time since World War II. It would be interesting to know if Obama believes that he has exercised fiscal restraint - or if he thinks the public will believe it.
3. Now, President Obama has done what what even Paul Krugman has called "bungled the line" by claiming that the private economy "is doing fine". One can accept his real point that public sector employment is being reduced while private sector employment is growing slowly, but we are still down 5 million jobs from the pre-recession peak, household incomes are shrinking and household wealth is down 40% in three years, foreclosures are unabated, and there is broad public economic fear for the short term - and the long term. It would be interesting to know what Obama thinks the private economy is - Wall Street? Small businesses? The 80 + % of workers not employed by the government? Even offering the most gracious interpretation, what thought came to Obama's teleprompter-less mind to make him say this?
Maybe Congressman Wilson was just a bit prescient. Even the Washington Post gave the President three pinnochios for the "fiscal restraint" claim, and the "doin' fine" comment will be grist for thousands of American Crossroads commercials. (I would offer it to Howard Dean who feels that Obama would be OK if he could just find a good slogan.) Perhaps we don't need to wait until November for Hans Christian Anderson's young child to make his observation about the emperor's sartorial deficiencies.
-----
This week's video is of Senator Diane Feinstein (D - CA) complaining about recent intelligence leaks - some from the top of the administration - which have compromised work with Israel against the Iranian nuclear program, the work of a Pakistani doctor who helped verify Osama bin Laden's location, infiltration of al Queda in Yemen, Obama's personal weekly approval of a terrorist "kill list", and other sensitive operations. At least we can take comfort from President Obama's position that politically-motivated leaks would be offensive.
bill bowen -6/15/12

OBAMA's Troubles:
SYRIA: Basically ASSAD has been given a Seal of Approval by Russia and Iran. Just hours after England announced that Putin had agreed ASSAD had to go the President met privately with Putin and the Russian leader made it clear that ASSAD had his protection. Meanwhile the slaughter continues and all the President can do about it evidently is look angry in photo ops with Putin. Of course, when his angered face was shown on TV he immediately arranged another photo op with Putin and cracked a joke in a back slapping session. Such leadership is the joke.
HOLDER: Refuses to relese the documents to the House and Senate committees. In classic Clinton stall tactics the President invokes "Executive Privilege" to protect his AG---or is he protecting the White House on this one?
ECONOMY: The Feds revised their economic forecast dwon from 2.6% GDP to "muddle along" somewhere around 2. Bernake was under assault from the press as he answered their questions about why an extension of TWIST rather than QE3 with the Fed now forecasting unemployment at 8.2% through 2012? Bernake sees some good signs on the horizon and is keeping his powder dry. What is the good news? India was described today by Jack Welch as the USA under "Carter"!Germany and northern Europe are now reporting 5% order drops of US products. Higher numbers in the south of Europe. Bonds in Spain topped 7% yields this week while people in Germany today bought bonds that paid 0%---please ,please keep my money and give it back to me when the world is safe!
IMMIGRATION The President issued an executive order for the immigration department to stop deporting illegal Mexicans age 30 or younger who came here before they were 16 and got degrees here. Last year he said he was not authorized to do that. I guess an election year changes the constitution.
Posted by: Bill McCormick | June 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM
Help me out here. My wife and I are getting by and trying to save money for the kids education. We know they will be going to a two year college because we can't afford the big ticket four year schools. May be able to swing it for two of the four. Anyway, now Obama is giving amnesty or whatever he calls it to young illegal immigrants to take up the space in college that should be for kids whose parents are paying the taxes to fund the schools. No problem with legal immigrant kids - no different really than mine. And do those kids get financial aid? Are they taking the summer jobs that my kids could get to help with their education? And is this all politics so he can get re-elected? Sure seems like it. He claims to support the working stiff - that's B---. He's supporting himself. Wants to be King.
Posted by: flyoverstate | June 16, 2012 at 05:27 PM
ANOTHER 'WHOPPER'; AS 'Obamacare' comes to light; it seems the 'Law of Unintended Consequences' meets the claim of 500 billion savings over 10 years by the AMATEUR authors. According to MMaulkin/Jim Demint Speech, there exists another Law of Medical Insurance that states "for every 1% increase of insurance cost ,250 -300,000 paritcipants drop off the rolls". Seems this has infected the so called 'slacker' rule which allows older dependents remaining at home to enjoy the parents coverage. In fact, the SEIU local 1199, has lettered its subscribers (30,000) that it can no longer offer that coverage. The net effect is to increase participation to the high income families only. The mandate also seems to be increasing dependency and acting as an employment disincentive.
Posted by: DickG | June 15, 2012 at 08:39 AM
'Joe Wilson'; South Carolina's US 2nd District (incidentaly). Recently on June 12th, Rep.Joe Wilson took 80% of the Republican Primary Re-election Vote. "GO JOE".
Posted by: DickG | June 14, 2012 at 11:31 PM